![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Sorry, not following along with the crowd doing the sexual purity meme that is currently around here. I decided to play along until I got to the "Fucking Sick" part if it where I saw "practicing polyamory" listed. The meme ceased being amusing right there.
I have a thing about blindly following labels, even as unconsciously or 'innocently' as in a meme. It goes all the way back to "pollock" jokes and fat jokes and even blonde jokes. It goes all the way up to kids today saying, "Oh, that's so gay!" to mean something stupid or unfashionable.
Prejudice is prejudice, folks. Yes, maybe I'm touchy because I am poly. But what if it put being bald or being overweight or liking to game under that category. It makes a statement that anyone who practices polyamory is a depraved person. If you actually have that opinion, fine; you are entitled to your own opinion. But if you don't, whether you are poly or not, and you let that question pass you by without a blink, you are allowing bigotry.
Ultrasensitive? Maybe...but then, I've always called people on fat jokes and loser jokes and 'retarded' jokes and race and gender jokes all my life and I'm not about to stop now.
It's not that far away from "towel-head" or "nigger" or "kike" or any of the other pejorative labels we'd be aghast to hear today. It's not that horribly far away from a gang of drunks beating up on the 'limp-wristed' fella from school.
The only way to fight prejudice is to call it and not put up with it, no matter where you find it.
Prejudice is prejudice; bigotry is bigotry.
I have a thing about blindly following labels, even as unconsciously or 'innocently' as in a meme. It goes all the way back to "pollock" jokes and fat jokes and even blonde jokes. It goes all the way up to kids today saying, "Oh, that's so gay!" to mean something stupid or unfashionable.
Prejudice is prejudice, folks. Yes, maybe I'm touchy because I am poly. But what if it put being bald or being overweight or liking to game under that category. It makes a statement that anyone who practices polyamory is a depraved person. If you actually have that opinion, fine; you are entitled to your own opinion. But if you don't, whether you are poly or not, and you let that question pass you by without a blink, you are allowing bigotry.
Ultrasensitive? Maybe...but then, I've always called people on fat jokes and loser jokes and 'retarded' jokes and race and gender jokes all my life and I'm not about to stop now.
It's not that far away from "towel-head" or "nigger" or "kike" or any of the other pejorative labels we'd be aghast to hear today. It's not that horribly far away from a gang of drunks beating up on the 'limp-wristed' fella from school.
The only way to fight prejudice is to call it and not put up with it, no matter where you find it.
Prejudice is prejudice; bigotry is bigotry.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:12 am (UTC)But I can say this, at least this meme wasn't written by a junior high boy!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:45 am (UTC)If only to see how bad I can get.
Like I saw a little while ago "knowledge is power, power corrupts, stay in school, be evil!"
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:14 am (UTC)http://www.theferrett.com/purity2/
As I said to Malvito, at the very least this one wasn't obviously written by a virginal junior high boy.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 03:41 am (UTC)I'm gonna be up all night with this one.
Resistance is NOT futile..
Date: 2007-08-17 12:48 am (UTC)Principled stands, amazingly enough, are still principled in my book. The use of such terms as verbal tools to inflict hatred are never a good thing, and as fellow humans, we should refrain from such practices.
The Golden Rule hasn't fallen out of favor, as far as I know. No need to change things now. ;-)
Re: Resistance is NOT futile..
Date: 2007-08-17 01:15 am (UTC)The Golden Rule may be a bit tarnished but I think it still has a lot of merit.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 02:21 am (UTC)You have an excellent point, my dear, but than you usually do. Kudos for not only passing it by but saying why because I agree with your Dad about the power of words and principles.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:45 pm (UTC)Thanks...it's also undoubtedly true that I'm a bit short on patience lately! But that doesn't stop my Dad from being right!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 11:37 am (UTC)I agree that even though its just a meme, it still reinforces a stigma. But just like daytime talk shows and news stand tabloids, I don't think it's a message medium that people take seriously.
...aren't I just a royal stick in the mud??? ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:40 pm (UTC)I pretty much do memes 'cause I'm wanting a bit of break or I think the pics are cool but not so much lately!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 02:49 pm (UTC)That being said, I think the point she has here is that, regardless of whether they are taken seriously or not it can still be a very, very slippery slope!
What happens when prejudice mind sets become common place in those arenas, and then starting spilling over into more 'mainstream' ones??Kwim.
Methinks that's why those of us "outside the box" get our panties in a wad over stuff that initially might seem pretty lame.
Because a prejudiced statement is a prejudiced statement, and is wrong no matter *what* mouth/medium/etc it comes from.Imho.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 05:49 pm (UTC)